Football

Michael Owen blames Man Utd goalscorer Marcus Rashford for mistake in Phil Foden’s equaliser

In the high-stakes Manchester derby, Phil Foden’s electrifying performance stole the spotlight, but not without controversy, as Michael Owen dissected Marcus Rashford’s role in Foden’s equalizer.

The clash began with Rashford’s explosive strike, sending Manchester United fans into raptures. His thunderous effort from 30 yards out put United ahead early in the game. However, Manchester City, relentless in their pursuit, refused to be deterred.

As the match unfolded, Foden, the City academy prodigy, emerged as the protagonist. With a composed finish past Andre Onana, he not only equalized but also doubled his tally, amplifying City’s dominance. Erling Haaland’s injury-time goal further solidified City’s 3-1 victory.

Yet, amidst the euphoria, Rashford faced scrutiny for his involvement in City’s equalizer. After a tangle with Kyle Walker, Rashford remained on the ground, appealing for a foul. Ten Hag’s frustration was palpable, as he earned a yellow card for his protests. Michael Owen, analyzing the incident on Optus Sport, placed the spotlight on Rashford’s questionable decision-making.

Owen’s assessment delved into the intricacies of Rashford’s positioning and control of the ball. He questioned Rashford’s attempt to navigate his opponent without ball possession, emphasizing the need for control before maneuvering. In Owen’s view, the referee’s decision not to award a foul was justified, highlighting Rashford’s potential defensive role had he been in position.

The analysis underscores the fine margins and split-second decisions that define football. Rashford’s momentary lapse and subsequent appeal inadvertently contributed to City’s equalizer, altering the course of the match.

As the debate ensues, Owen’s insights illuminate the complexities of professional football, where individual actions can sway the outcome of a game. In the frenetic atmosphere of a derby, every move carries weight, shaping the narrative of the contest.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button